Starting 2013 with a bang, we continue our armageddon series about the science behind the end of the world.
On 8 November 2007, the Minor Planet Center issued a routine "Minor Planet Electronic Circular", reporting on observations of a newly discovered object, designated 2007 VN84 - some 4 million km from the Earth. It was heading towards us at a speed of 45,000 km/h - over 12 km every second. It was set to pass within 5,300km of Earth just five days later.
![]() |
The gravitational pull of planets can change the orbits of smaller bodies. This "slingshot effect" is sometimes used by interplanetary spacecraft. Image courtesy DLR |
Obviously, 2007 VN84 didn't hit the Earth, and nobody was hurt. But how bad would it have been if it had? Well, it's unlikely anybody would have been hurt, but it certainly would have been embarrassing. This was no space rock, but a spacecraft, carefully being flown past the Earth by the European Space Agency to change its orbit - in exactly the same way they'd done at Mars, several months earlier (and at the Earth, before that). 2007 VN84 was more commonly known as Rosetta.
This mix-up was embarrassing, but also quite alarming for some.
After retiring the designation 2007 VN84, the Minor Planet Center stated: “This incident highlights the deplorable state of availability of positional information on distant artificial objects.”
But what if this had been a real asteroid, heading towards us? Five days is not a lot of notice, though Rosetta is only quite small. A larger asteroid would (hopefully) be spotted sooner. Most people have heard the theory that dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid, but is the Earth endangered by a similar collision?
Essentially, we need to ask three questions: "How bad is being hit by an asteroid?", "Is it likely to happen?" and "How much warning would we have?". As it turns out, these questions are very closely connected.