So why are we here
then? Come to that, why does anything exist at all? These questions
might sound more philosophical than scientific, but this is the true
scale of the questions on which the scientific method can now be
brought to bear. The question of why the world around us exists, why
the matter in the universe has not all annihilated with antimatter is
a big one, and this week I was fortunate enough to speak with Harry Cliff at the London Science Museum, formerly of CERN, and Dr. Adrian Bevan
at QMUL, about why this asymmetry exists. We spoke at some length
about violation of symmetries and the experimental techniques we can
use to see where matter and antimatter behave differently, I am
extremely grateful for their assistance, as I feel that I have
learned a great deal about the way in which cutting edge particle
physics research is carried out.
These big questions
can seem daunting at times, but it is worth remembering that science
often progresses in small steps, the solutions to seemingly trivial
questions leading us bit by bit towards the answers to larger ones.
One of these smaller questions, which I have been looking at this
week is why there are giant arcs of light beside distant galaxy
clusters. We understand quite well the gravitational lensing effect
which produces these phenomena, but our best models of the universe
predict that the probability of us seeing it so far away in space is
practically zero. So this small question points us towards possible
issues with our greater understanding of the universe itself.
Back here on earth, I had a discussion this Wednesday with Dr. Kostya Trachenko at QMUL, regarding the nature of glasses and the glass transition. He dispelled an apparently apocryphal notion regarding the fluidity of stained glass windows with which I had been impressed some time ago - I had been misinformed that the thickening towards the bottom of the panes in these old windows was due to the glass flowing like a liquid. According to Dr. Trachenko, although this flow would occur, it would take longer than the age of the universe to produce the observed effect! Our conversation also helped me gain a greater insight into what constitutes a phase of matter and the outstanding problem of describing the behaviour of liquids. He also provided me with links to a range of other resources for further reading, which I found most helpful.
An Einstein ring caused by gravitational lensing, pictured by Hubble |
Back here on earth, I had a discussion this Wednesday with Dr. Kostya Trachenko at QMUL, regarding the nature of glasses and the glass transition. He dispelled an apparently apocryphal notion regarding the fluidity of stained glass windows with which I had been impressed some time ago - I had been misinformed that the thickening towards the bottom of the panes in these old windows was due to the glass flowing like a liquid. According to Dr. Trachenko, although this flow would occur, it would take longer than the age of the universe to produce the observed effect! Our conversation also helped me gain a greater insight into what constitutes a phase of matter and the outstanding problem of describing the behaviour of liquids. He also provided me with links to a range of other resources for further reading, which I found most helpful.
Of course, if you'd like to read more about these mysteries, then don't forget to follow TWDK on facebook or twitter, so we can tell you when the main site goes live!
No comments:
Post a Comment